i can't stand staying in bed when i wake up, especially if it's early and i want to sleep more, but can't. *sigh* i woke up before 6am again. i hate this. i'm gonna be tired later today. hell, i'll probably be tired by 7am, but i can't sleep then, nooo.
my roommates are always up late, but i am in bed around 11, due to my abundance of 8:30 class. they leave on the lights in the common areas. this, too, drives me nuts. maybe next quarter i'll be able to hang out more, depending on how my crazy schedule works itself out. my boss is still working on the work schedule--though i fully expect my monday and wednesday afternoons to be spent in the microlab--and dr. richards, while, uh, complimenting me on my promptness in giving her schedule information, still doesn't know when the one required weekly meeting will be for her lab. i'm just impatient; everything will be ok. at least i'm *registered* for the class.
i still need to get a key, though. i went in on tuesday with my necessary forms, only to discover i needed to pay a $25 fee (or deposit, i am not sure if i get it back or not) for the privilege of holding lab keys, and i hadn't brought my checkbook. i returned yesterday, check in hand, only to learn that the person responsible for handling checks was, for one, not in the business office yesterday, and, two, was out to lunch, anyway, so could i come back another time. jesus, they just want to get me overly familiar with guthrie or something. fair is fair, i suppose; i am a psych major, i should know how the office works, right? heh.
i am just so glad that my paper is written, though i am a little worried that it won't meet the lofty standards for excellence. it turned out to be kind of a well-organized rant without much in the way of backstory or refuting evidence or anything truly analytical like that. i did make a really cool social psych theory connection, though--i hypothesized that part of america's reason for growing apathetic was a kind of negative foot-in-the-door phenomenon. foot-in-the-door usually refers to a method of persuading people by asking them for a small thing, then a big one; i applied this to putnam's evidence that americans now shopped at all these homogeneous corporate stores in a way that, while it may not be entirely correct in keeping with the actual idea in psych (also used in marketing, obviously), explains why this rise of corporate stores over mom-and-pop local businesses would contribute to voter apathy, which is something that baffled putnam. i think that, by giving americans fewer options in little things like shopping decisions, we're taking away that foot in the door, so to speak, that encourages us to make bigger decisions like who to elect as president. if that makes any sense at all, and i thought it did, and i was rather pleased with myself for thinking it up in the first place. hee. i just hope it actually comes across in the paper as making sense and, if it does, that my TA buys it enough to mark up the big ol' 3.3 or better. [good grade arbitrarily chosen based on past performance in that class.]
whatever, i'm probably insane, anyway. he probably won't think i explained enough about my other social psych invasion of the individualistic vs. collectivistic culture theories, either. and i didn't stick to my ranty ideas in the introduction. whaaaaaaaaatever.
only two more days of class, woo!
i talked to my old friend rachel last night. we talk every few days now, i think. i haven't seen her in probably years, though. she is probably the non-family person that i've known the longest while still talking to occasionally, though. we have been friends since fifth grade, and last night was the first time we discussed sex in any detail. she also just found out that she has an ovarian cyst the size of a golf ball. gah.
and now it's time to say goodbye...in favor of the liquid environment of my shower.
listening: sonic youth - bone